Advertisement
Come and protest the "amero" AUGUST 18th at 1 p.m. at Seattle Center!!!
Read below for more information...
Opposition Builds to the North American Union
author: onthewingsofhelios
August 20-21, 2007 the leaders of Canada, the United States, and Mexico will meet in Montebello, Quebec to attend their semi-secret third Security and Prosperity Partnership of North America summit meeting to advance the North American Union that is already rapidly being established without the involvement of congress or the knowledge of citizens.
Connie Fogal of the Canadian Action Party was on the Alex Jones Radio Show at infowars.com yesterday to discuss the upcoming meeting in Montebello, Quebec, and where the press and public are NOT welcome.
A 25 km (18 mile) security perimeter will be established around the town of Montebello to keep reporters and demonstrators from bringing attention to what is going on; however, many reporters and protesters plan to go there anyway, at least to the perimeter.
A demonstration protesting the meeting and the North American Union will also be held in the United States at the Seattle Center in Seattle on Saturday, August 18, at 1 PM.
In March 2005 George W. Bush and the leaders of Canada and Mexico signed an agreement to form a security and prosperity partnership for a North American "Community." In other words, they agreed to build a North American Union, but while the agreement received little media coverage at the time, it would take another year for even those following the news closely to begin to the significance and scope of the agreement. Every one of our governmental departments was joined with an appointed spp.gov working group that is rewriting regulations and laws to merge the three governmental systems into a regional government. Congress will serve largely to rubber stamp laws as they are presented by these unelected committees, as is now the case for legislatures in the European Union countries.
According to Connie Fogal of the Canadian Action Party, the spp.gov agreement was a political coup d'etat. It was a take over of the executive government of North America with a transfer of power into private unelected committees following the Soviet model. It was, as radio talk show host Alex Jones says, "Red Dawn in slow motion."
The idea of a North American Union might sound innocent enough or even like a nice idea unless you understand the form of government being set in place. It is worth setting aside time to study what is going on and the difference between the Soviet-style system of appointed committees being set up as opposed to the constitutional system set up by the Founding Fathers with elected government and representatives that serve the people, separation of powers between those who make the laws and those who administer the country, and separation of power between the federal government and the states. The American system was set up to insure that the power remained with the people and could not be taken over by a group who might seize control of government. Of course, the ultra-rich and their self-serving think tanks and agents would prefer to simply take over and have their self-appointed committees decide how we will all live. It will be the middle class and average citizen who will have to make sacrifices of freedoms, rights, and their standard of living.
It is worth noting that without the helpful event of September 11 and the pretext of a lurking enemy, these changes necessary for the North American Union such as the umbrella government of Homeland Security, the Patriot Act, the National ID Card (internal passport), "North American Community", which have long been planned could never could have been justified.
Thanks to the effort of activists such as Connie Fogal in Canada, CNN's Lou Dobbs, investigative reporter Dr. Jerome Corsi and his book the Late Great USA, and Alex Jones' documentaries and radio show in the United States, the word is starting to getting out about the take over of our executive branch by the private interests who control the Council on Foreign Relations. We need to see the larger picture of the events of September 11 and how they have been used to justify take over plans that have long been in the works.
The North American Union did not just spring from September 11 as some kind of sudden bust of inspiration. It was planned and plotted for years by a small group of ultra rich who want to run the world. It's up to the people to speak up for their own selfish interests and to support the US Constitution and Bill of Rights and a government that represents and serves the people.
Banker David Rockefeller, honorary chairman of the Council on Foreign Relations, the private think tank that planned the North American Union, with a model of his early project: his Twin Towers.
PICTURE tinyurl.com/2flkue
REFERENCES:
CAP/PAC Leader calls the SPP a "hostile takeover" of the apparatus of democracy
August 2, 2007 tinyurl.com/23t7wt
Discussion of North American Union
Jerome Corsi, writer of the book, The Late Great USA
October 2, 2006
AUDIO tinyurl.com/yvfot2
Start at 5 minutes for Dr. Jerome Corsi and his analysis of the plans for the North American Union.
Interview with Dr. Jerome Corsi
VIDEO
youtube.com/watch
THE COUNCIL ON FOREIGN RELATIONS (CFR) PLANNED THE NORTH AMERICAN UNION
VP Dick Cheney talks to David Rockefeller and the Council on Foreign Relations
VIDEO tinyurl.com/2wkcbl
New World Order Chieftains Openly Discuss Dismantling US Border and Bringing Us into the Pan-American Union
June 10, 2005 Links to other articles tinyurl.com/2z6nab
THE CANADIAN COUNCIL OF CHIEF EXECUTIVES (CCE)
The Canadian Council of Chief Executives, a council of the top 150 corporations in Canada ,is dominated by the Council on Foreign Relations in the United States.
Dismantle the border, CEOs say
Make it an 'internal checkpoint,' council argues in citing security and trade concerns
January 14, 2003 tinyurl.com/2x2z97
SECURITY AND PROSPERITY PARTNERSHIP OF NORTH AMERICA (SPP)
It has been described as a hostile take over of the executive branches of the three countries of North America.
www.spp.gov/
Task force urges creation of 'Fortress America'
Increase police, security co-operation, create common external tariff
March 14, 2005 tinyurl.com/funao
President Quietly Creating 'NAFTA Plus'
May 24, 2006
gothinkblog.com/
The American Union is Already Here
June 20, 2006 tinyurl.com/2a9fhh
Canada, the United States, and Mexico... a possible merger?
June 20, 2006 tinyurl.com/ruh9u
A SUPER HIGHWAY WILL BRING GOOD OFF-LOADED IN MEXICO TO THE US AND CANADA
NAFTA Super Highway Map
October 2, 2006
PICTURE tinyurl.com/23xy8o
Bush Administration Quietly Plans NAFTA Super Highway
June 12, 2006 tinyurl.com/hakrn
THE CURRENCY WILL BE THE AMERO
The Plan to Replace the Dollar With the 'Amero'
May 22, 2006 tinyurl.com/gjt24
London stock trader urges move to 'amero'
Says many unaware of plan to replace dollar with N. American currency
November 2, 2006 tinyurl.com/yu6nuc
LOU DOBBS IS ONE OF THE FEW IN THE MEDIA REPORTING ABOUT THE NAU
Lou Dobbs Discusses CFR Plans for a North American Union
Week of July 19, 2005
VIDEO (4:08 min )
tinyurl.com/2sgath
CANADIAN, US, AND MEXICO POLICE AND MILITARY ARE MERGING
Canada-US troop deal 'close'
August 29, 2002 tinyurl.com/2zmlta
Cop wins RCMP settlement after highway search
Jan 28 2005 tinyurl.com/3k347
Armed Mexican Troops Invade US
Eyewitnesses: Under cover of aid, combat ready soldiers roll into Texas
September 8, 2005 tinyurl.com/c23mv
OPPOSITION TO THE NORTH AMERICAN UNION PLANS
Stop the Security and Prosperity Partnership
stopspp.com/stopspp/
Stop the North American Union
www.stopthenau.org/
Canadian Action Party
tinyurl.com/25obxs
contact phone: 604-872-2128
Corridor Watch www.corridorwatch.org
Texas Toll Party www.texastollparty.com
U.S.-Mexico merger opposition intensifies
July 10, 2006 tinyurl.com/pb4nq
THE ULTIMATE GOAL IS A SOVIET-STYLE GLOBAL GOVERNMENT
The Creation of the Global Union
March 13, 2006
VIDEO tinyurl.com/m9d7n
What is wrong with merging the three countries of North America into one regional government? Those in the know, such as a former Soviet dissident warn of an EU Dictatorship, and the North American Union will follow the same model.
Former Soviet Dissident Warns Of EU Socialist Dictatorship
March 2, 2006
tinyurl.com/jgl3d
This might be an explanation of Communism that you have not heard before: a plan by the super-rich for taking over large regions and their resources.
Book: None Dare Call It Conspiracy
reactor-core.org/none-dare.html
found at portland.indymedia.org/en/200...6.shtml
Read below for more information...
Opposition Builds to the North American Union
author: onthewingsofhelios
August 20-21, 2007 the leaders of Canada, the United States, and Mexico will meet in Montebello, Quebec to attend their semi-secret third Security and Prosperity Partnership of North America summit meeting to advance the North American Union that is already rapidly being established without the involvement of congress or the knowledge of citizens.
Connie Fogal of the Canadian Action Party was on the Alex Jones Radio Show at infowars.com yesterday to discuss the upcoming meeting in Montebello, Quebec, and where the press and public are NOT welcome.
A 25 km (18 mile) security perimeter will be established around the town of Montebello to keep reporters and demonstrators from bringing attention to what is going on; however, many reporters and protesters plan to go there anyway, at least to the perimeter.
A demonstration protesting the meeting and the North American Union will also be held in the United States at the Seattle Center in Seattle on Saturday, August 18, at 1 PM.
In March 2005 George W. Bush and the leaders of Canada and Mexico signed an agreement to form a security and prosperity partnership for a North American "Community." In other words, they agreed to build a North American Union, but while the agreement received little media coverage at the time, it would take another year for even those following the news closely to begin to the significance and scope of the agreement. Every one of our governmental departments was joined with an appointed spp.gov working group that is rewriting regulations and laws to merge the three governmental systems into a regional government. Congress will serve largely to rubber stamp laws as they are presented by these unelected committees, as is now the case for legislatures in the European Union countries.
According to Connie Fogal of the Canadian Action Party, the spp.gov agreement was a political coup d'etat. It was a take over of the executive government of North America with a transfer of power into private unelected committees following the Soviet model. It was, as radio talk show host Alex Jones says, "Red Dawn in slow motion."
The idea of a North American Union might sound innocent enough or even like a nice idea unless you understand the form of government being set in place. It is worth setting aside time to study what is going on and the difference between the Soviet-style system of appointed committees being set up as opposed to the constitutional system set up by the Founding Fathers with elected government and representatives that serve the people, separation of powers between those who make the laws and those who administer the country, and separation of power between the federal government and the states. The American system was set up to insure that the power remained with the people and could not be taken over by a group who might seize control of government. Of course, the ultra-rich and their self-serving think tanks and agents would prefer to simply take over and have their self-appointed committees decide how we will all live. It will be the middle class and average citizen who will have to make sacrifices of freedoms, rights, and their standard of living.
It is worth noting that without the helpful event of September 11 and the pretext of a lurking enemy, these changes necessary for the North American Union such as the umbrella government of Homeland Security, the Patriot Act, the National ID Card (internal passport), "North American Community", which have long been planned could never could have been justified.
Thanks to the effort of activists such as Connie Fogal in Canada, CNN's Lou Dobbs, investigative reporter Dr. Jerome Corsi and his book the Late Great USA, and Alex Jones' documentaries and radio show in the United States, the word is starting to getting out about the take over of our executive branch by the private interests who control the Council on Foreign Relations. We need to see the larger picture of the events of September 11 and how they have been used to justify take over plans that have long been in the works.
The North American Union did not just spring from September 11 as some kind of sudden bust of inspiration. It was planned and plotted for years by a small group of ultra rich who want to run the world. It's up to the people to speak up for their own selfish interests and to support the US Constitution and Bill of Rights and a government that represents and serves the people.
Banker David Rockefeller, honorary chairman of the Council on Foreign Relations, the private think tank that planned the North American Union, with a model of his early project: his Twin Towers.
PICTURE tinyurl.com/2flkue
REFERENCES:
CAP/PAC Leader calls the SPP a "hostile takeover" of the apparatus of democracy
August 2, 2007 tinyurl.com/23t7wt
Discussion of North American Union
Jerome Corsi, writer of the book, The Late Great USA
October 2, 2006
AUDIO tinyurl.com/yvfot2
Start at 5 minutes for Dr. Jerome Corsi and his analysis of the plans for the North American Union.
Interview with Dr. Jerome Corsi
VIDEO
youtube.com/watch
THE COUNCIL ON FOREIGN RELATIONS (CFR) PLANNED THE NORTH AMERICAN UNION
VP Dick Cheney talks to David Rockefeller and the Council on Foreign Relations
VIDEO tinyurl.com/2wkcbl
New World Order Chieftains Openly Discuss Dismantling US Border and Bringing Us into the Pan-American Union
June 10, 2005 Links to other articles tinyurl.com/2z6nab
THE CANADIAN COUNCIL OF CHIEF EXECUTIVES (CCE)
The Canadian Council of Chief Executives, a council of the top 150 corporations in Canada ,is dominated by the Council on Foreign Relations in the United States.
Dismantle the border, CEOs say
Make it an 'internal checkpoint,' council argues in citing security and trade concerns
January 14, 2003 tinyurl.com/2x2z97
SECURITY AND PROSPERITY PARTNERSHIP OF NORTH AMERICA (SPP)
It has been described as a hostile take over of the executive branches of the three countries of North America.
www.spp.gov/
Task force urges creation of 'Fortress America'
Increase police, security co-operation, create common external tariff
March 14, 2005 tinyurl.com/funao
President Quietly Creating 'NAFTA Plus'
May 24, 2006
gothinkblog.com/
The American Union is Already Here
June 20, 2006 tinyurl.com/2a9fhh
Canada, the United States, and Mexico... a possible merger?
June 20, 2006 tinyurl.com/ruh9u
A SUPER HIGHWAY WILL BRING GOOD OFF-LOADED IN MEXICO TO THE US AND CANADA
NAFTA Super Highway Map
October 2, 2006
PICTURE tinyurl.com/23xy8o
Bush Administration Quietly Plans NAFTA Super Highway
June 12, 2006 tinyurl.com/hakrn
THE CURRENCY WILL BE THE AMERO
The Plan to Replace the Dollar With the 'Amero'
May 22, 2006 tinyurl.com/gjt24
London stock trader urges move to 'amero'
Says many unaware of plan to replace dollar with N. American currency
November 2, 2006 tinyurl.com/yu6nuc
LOU DOBBS IS ONE OF THE FEW IN THE MEDIA REPORTING ABOUT THE NAU
Lou Dobbs Discusses CFR Plans for a North American Union
Week of July 19, 2005
VIDEO (4:08 min )
tinyurl.com/2sgath
CANADIAN, US, AND MEXICO POLICE AND MILITARY ARE MERGING
Canada-US troop deal 'close'
August 29, 2002 tinyurl.com/2zmlta
Cop wins RCMP settlement after highway search
Jan 28 2005 tinyurl.com/3k347
Armed Mexican Troops Invade US
Eyewitnesses: Under cover of aid, combat ready soldiers roll into Texas
September 8, 2005 tinyurl.com/c23mv
OPPOSITION TO THE NORTH AMERICAN UNION PLANS
Stop the Security and Prosperity Partnership
stopspp.com/stopspp/
Stop the North American Union
www.stopthenau.org/
Canadian Action Party
tinyurl.com/25obxs
contact phone: 604-872-2128
Corridor Watch www.corridorwatch.org
Texas Toll Party www.texastollparty.com
U.S.-Mexico merger opposition intensifies
July 10, 2006 tinyurl.com/pb4nq
THE ULTIMATE GOAL IS A SOVIET-STYLE GLOBAL GOVERNMENT
The Creation of the Global Union
March 13, 2006
VIDEO tinyurl.com/m9d7n
What is wrong with merging the three countries of North America into one regional government? Those in the know, such as a former Soviet dissident warn of an EU Dictatorship, and the North American Union will follow the same model.
Former Soviet Dissident Warns Of EU Socialist Dictatorship
March 2, 2006
tinyurl.com/jgl3d
This might be an explanation of Communism that you have not heard before: a plan by the super-rich for taking over large regions and their resources.
Book: None Dare Call It Conspiracy
reactor-core.org/none-dare.html
found at portland.indymedia.org/en/200...6.shtml
posted by:
|
Seattle
|
Advertisement
Advertisement
-
Re: Protest the North American Union!!!
Mon, August 27, 2007 - 5:26 AMarticle from the Vancouver Sun
Will Canada become the 51st state?
The Security and Prosperity Partnership: what it's all about and
what it could mean for Canadians
Kelly Patterson, CanWest News Service
Published: Saturday, August 18, 2007
To some, it is a "corporate coup d'etat," a conspiracy by big
business to turn Canada into the 51st state by stealth. Others see
it as a plot to destroy the U.S. by forcing it into a North American
union with "socialist Canada" and "corrupt Mexico."
It is the Security and Prosperity Partnership, a sprawling effort to
forge closer ties among the three nations in everything from anti-
terrorism measures to energy strategies to food-safety and pesticide
rules.
Launched two years ago by then prime minister Paul Martin, President
George W. Bush and his Mexican counterpart, Vicente Fox, at the so-
called Three Amigos summit in Waco, Tex., the SPP grew out of
concerns that security crackdowns would cripple cross-border trade.
Email to a friend
Printer friendly
Font: ****With juggernauts such as China and India looming on the
horizon, the three countries agreed they had to act fast to stay
competitive. Now the SPP has grown into a mind-boggling array of
some 300 initiatives, involving 19 teams of bureaucrats from all
three countries.
INTEGRATION BY STEALTH
Its stated mission is "to keep our borders closed to terrorism yet
open to trade" by fostering "greater co-operation and information-
sharing" in security protocols and economic areas such as product
safety.
Little known in Canada, the accord, if implemented, could affect
almost every aspect of Canadian life, from what drugs you can access
to whether you can board a plane and even what ingredients go into
your morning cornflakes.
While you may not have heard of the SPP, you may have heard about
some of the controversies it has sparked: Canada's adoption of a no-
fly list, negotiations to lower Canada's pesticide standards to U.S.
levels or fears the deal will lead to bulk-water exports.
Liberal leader Stephane Dion charged Friday that, "under the veil of
secrecy," Harper has let the Americans run roughshod over Canada,
covertly using the SPP to impose a U.S. agenda on Canada. That's not
what the Liberals intended when they signed the deal, which was
meant to give Canada a stronger voice in Washington, not turn it
into an"imitation" of the U.S., he says.
Maude Barlow of the Council of Canadians says it is big business
that is calling the shots, pushing aggressively for the
harmonization -- and downgrading -- of everything from security
norms to food standards, in a move that will lead to
the "integration by stealth" of the three nations.
"Canadians would be shocked" if they knew the true scope of the SPP,
says Barlow, whose Ottawa-based organization represents about
100,000 members.
Fringe groups such as the Canadian Action Party and the Minutemen in
the U.S. go further, arguing the SPP is a plot to sweep all three
nations into a North American union.
"Where are they getting this stuff?" says Thomas d'Aquino, head of
the Canadian Council of Chief Executives, which helped launch the
SPP.
"This is a very nitty-gritty, workaday initiative" to make trade
safer and more efficient through such steps as expanding border
crossings and information-sharing programs on plant and animal
safety, he says.
www.canada.com/vancouvers.../story.html
4aac-af56-5636db7ef5a3
continued:
Will Canada become the 51st state?
The Security and Prosperity Partnership: what it's all about and
what it could mean for Canadians
Kelly Patterson, CanWest News Service
Published: Saturday, August 18, 2007
Other SPP projects are no-brainers, such as plans to cooperate in
fighting West Nile virus and flu pandemics.
As for fears of a North American union, "anyone who believes that is
smoking something," says d'Aquino.
This weekend, the debate hits the headlines across the nation as the
three heads of state and their advisers converge on Montebello,
Que., 60 kilometres east of Ottawa, for the SPP's third annual
summit.
Email to a friend
Printer friendly
Font: ****Thousands of protesters are also expected to descend on
the area, hoping to confront the "Three Banditos" about a deal they
say is a secretive sellout to the cowboy capitalism and militarism
of the superpower to Canada's south.
"We always hoped from the outset we could broaden it beyond
security," says Roland Paris, a University of Ottawa professor who
worked as an adviser in the Privy Council Office when the SPP was
launched. He adds that the SPP's architects hoped the "regular high-
level meetings" would help "overcome bureaucratic inertia."
SOVEREIGNTY UNDER FIRE
But they also helped big business and its government allies bypass
both the public and Parliament to push through a host of
controversial changes without debate or scrutiny, critics charge.
They say the accord has enshrined and fast-tracked a longstanding
effort to quietly harmonize Canadian programs with those of the U.S.
in everything from military policy to food and drug standards.
"The SPP is an unacceptable, closed-door process with enormous
implications for Canadians," says NDP trade critic Peter Julian.
Roland Paris scoffs at charges the SPP is a grand design. If
anything, he says, it is a timid collection of piddling efforts that
has become bogged down in bureaucratic red tape.
"This is not a political vision of the future of the continent. If
it were, it would be worth the fuss."
Defenders of the SPP dismiss concerns about regulatory change as
fear-mongering, saying the accord aims only to cut out minor,
needless variations between the three countries.
The goal is to end the "tyranny of small differences" that can turn
the border into a theatre of the absurd, says John Kirton, a
University of Toronto professor and expert in the environmental
effects of free trade.
If fact, the SPP could dramatically raise standards across North
America, proponents say, because it promotes information-sharing
among the three countries.
Scientists would swap data on everything from car safety to new
chemicals, enabling regulators to better evaluate products and react
more quickly to public health threats.
The SPP also includes projects with obvious benefits for all three
nations, such as reducing sulphur in fuel and air pollution from
ships, and coordinating efforts to curb plant and animal diseases.
All three governments insist that the three nations remain sovereign
under the SPP: If Canada doesn't like the way the U.S. does
something, it can go its own way.
But NDP trade critic Julian is not so sure. He worries about the
effect regulatory convergence will have in the future.
If, for example, Canada wants to pass new rules to deal with
greenhouse gases, it could mean "Canada would have to go to
Washington and lobby for the kinds of standards and protections they
want," he says.
© The Vancouver Sun 2007
